December 2024 — EdTech Impact helps teachers and designated safeguarding leads find the best safeguard software for their school. Read reviews and customer ratings, compare pricing, screenshots and features, or learn more in our safeguarding software for schools buyers' guide.
Improve your understanding of safeguarding software and master the ability to conduct effective market research with our guide.
We've been evaluating the EdTech marketplace since 2019, empowering educators to make informed decisions, and to help providers increase the quality of their products.
Read more about our mission, our quality framework and reviewer guidelines to learn how we keep EdTech Impact a collaborative and trustworthy place for everyone.
Safeguarding software comprises digital tools and systems designed to enhance the safety and wellbeing of students within educational settings. These technologies are crafted to complement existing safeguarding policies in schools, streamlining processes and fortifying their efficacy.
Outlined below are six key categories of this technology:
By leveraging safeguarding software across these categories, educational institutions can enhance their ability to create and maintain safe and supportive environments for students.
The features and benefits of safeguarding software for schools are dependent on their specialism. Here are some of the most popular safeguard software categories, along with their corresponding features and benefits:
teamSOS: “Having an accurate and comprehensive record ensures no issue, however minor, can fall through the gaps. Gathering all the details of all incidents enables professionals to see the whole picture, ensuring that the right actions are taken and a full follow up completed.”
Smoothwall: “The digital realm has no boundaries, meaning Designated Safeguarding Leads (DSLs) cannot leave any corner untouched. Monitoring systems remove the potential of missing a vital concern: the email never sent; notes in a word file that were later deleted, and so on.”
Securus Software: “Schools must have both a robust filtering solution AND a robust monitoring system in place, a key focus in the latest KCSiE guidance and the Ofsted inspection framework.”
Smoothwall: “Safeguarding software for schools offers students a direct outreach tool, without having to admit to needing help in person. It removes the fear and hesitation of approaching for help, and offers an intervention tool that allows a vulnerable person to receive aid instantly.”
A further step towards understanding the potential of safeguarding software for schools involves confronting potential misconceptions. After all, you may think the technology “does this”, when really it is designed “for this”.
Here are the most common misconceptions when it comes to safeguarding systems:
Filtering systems can block websites with ease, while safeguarding recording systems provide efficient incident documentation. However, reliance on retrospective action makes for a limited safeguarding policy.
By adding monitoring systems to your school’s safeguarding processes, their ability to pre-empt, or predict, means schools can safeguard against, or in advance of, likely incidents.
Securus Software: “Monitoring systems provide an early warning system. They can detect incidents of concern, providing a truer picture of any background issues a student may be facing, and allowing safeguarding staff to deal with the situation and help change future behaviours.””
Furthermore, digital citizenship education is often supplanted by the immediate short-term offerings of filtering systems, and this can exacerbate existing perceptions towards safeguarding that are limited in scope:
Musah Abdulmumini, IT Administrator: “It is believed that safeguarding software’s primary purpose is to restrict access and limit freedom on the internet. This is true to a degree, but its main purpose should be teaching students how to navigate the digital world safely.”
Often, the buck for recording and managing safeguarding incidents is passed to specific individuals, which poses a limitation in understanding the bigger picture around children and their wider activities within schools, especially regarding the broader issue of Keeping Children Safe in Education.
Furthermore, a reliance on hardworking individuals to deliver a high standard of student care above and beyond their normal workload can lead to burnout and inefficiencies.
Orah: “Modern safeguarding software for schools is specifically designed to relieve the pressure on teachers to safeguard, allowing schools to share the duty of care and create a safe and nurturing school environment.”
It is human nature to resent additional paperwork or mandatory training requirements, especially when added to an already busy workload. However, uprooting box-ticking perspectives towards safeguarding is exactly how EdTech solutions are designed to help.
Tes Safeguarding: “Safeguarding software should be employed to aid and speed up the recording of all concerns, allowing good safeguarding practice to become a part of our every day. It should never be cumbersome, nor should it be reserved for escalated cases.”
It’s important to have an in-depth understanding of which areas require extra attention or improvement before considering any EdTech solution, as this will provide focus to your market research.
For example, if you’re consistently observing that students are accessing inappropriate content at school, then it would make sense to find a filtering solution. If your students are noticeably reluctant to speak with staff about their wellbeing and safety, you may want software that enables them to do this through a platform, rather than face to face.
This is especially pertinent considering the evolving statutory guidance for schools and colleges, which necessitates mapping the role of your prospective solution to the official safeguarding systems in place at your school. In 2023’s Keeping Children Safe in Education (KCSiE), these include:
So, what are the most common outcomes safeguarding software is designed to deliver and, based on user experience, what is the effectiveness of their impact? This is what we found:
Technology widely varies, meaning it is important to discern the exact level of training and support your school requires. Knowing the features of the technology is one thing, but this means nothing if you don’t know how to actually implement the solution effectively.
These are the most common types of training and support you can expect from Safeguarding Systems:
An effective procurement strategy will be appropriately budgeted, and recognise the type of pricing model that is best-suited to the needs of its school.
Below are the specific pricing models adopted by safeguarding software for schools, as well as the average and median cost of solutions found on our marketplace:
An important purchasing consideration is product suitability. After all, it’s important to understand a prospective solution’s relevance to the contextual needs of your school.
On EdTech Impact, providers are asked to provide details on their product’s learner age appropriateness, and whether their solution supports parent access. This is what we found across our marketplace:
Ultimately, effectively mapping your purchasing considerations can limit the potential for hiccups when implementing the safeguarding solution in your school, so be mindful not to overlook this important step. Once the contract is signed, your options are limited.
Given the stricter safeguarding requirements outlined in the 2023 KCSiE report, and the continual shift towards a more digitally focused education environment, understanding the forthcoming evolution of safeguarding software for schools is crucial.
In light of this, we consulted our experts to share how they anticipated the transformation of safeguarding EdTech would look over the next few years. Here’s what they had to say:
Smoothwall: “As learning becomes increasingly tech enabled, safeguarding is shifting from something that’s ‘done to you’ into something with involvement from all parties. The school, the parents, and the students themselves will feel like they have more of a voice, meaning we will begin to see lines blurring between who is responsible for wellbeing.
i) As a preventative tool
teamSOS: “There should be a movement from recording events after the fact to preventative “in the moment” responses, allowing interventions to be faster and more appropriate.”
ii) As a fully moderated service
Smoothwall: “It will be compulsory, or widely recognised, that any monitoring provision must be a fully moderated service, allowing DSLs to shift their focus onto intervention. No longer will they take personal accountability to find the needle in the haystack; instead, they will only be expected to respond to validated alerts, allowing their time to be spent on supporting vulnerable people in need; a vital and transformative evolution.”
teamSOS: “We predict an evolution from standalone, single purpose systems to technology that supports a more holistic view of children. This could involve greater integration with management information systems or the broadening of reporting and analytics capabilities.”
Boardingware: “As student safety and welfare becomes increasingly critical in the eyes of parents and families, more families may make decisions on where to send their children based on how much a school shows that they care.”
Securus Product Suite: “With more intelligent technologies being promoted and new platforms geared towards the younger generation, we have to keep up with the new digital threats that we see emerging. In this ever-changing digital landscape, there will be a greater need to protect children, both online and offline.”
Smoothwall: “With the advent of generative AI, safeguarding technology will have no choice but to evolve to keep up with the rate of increasing threats. For instance, technology firms are vowing to tackle the increasing spread of AI images of child sex abuse after The Internet Watch Foundation recently found 2,978 AI images of children which breached UK law, a heartbreaking statistic. It will be a challenge, but safeguarding tools will have to transform along with wider technological innovation.”
Updated on: 22 March 2024